93-100 A
85-92 B
75-84 C
70-74 D
0-69 F
We wanted something more specific than just 4, 3, 2, or 1 because it is possible for a student to master some of the level 3 content and all of the level 2 content. It wouldn't make sense to give that kid a 2 or a 3. We needed some middle ground. We considered using .5, but we also felt like that wasn't specific enough. After much discussion we settled on a .33 grading scale. Here it is:
4.0 – 100% A
3.67 – 97% A
3.33 – 92% B
3.0 – 90% B
2.67 – 83% C
2.33 – 77% C
2.0 – 70% D
1.67 – 67% F
1.33 – 63% F
1.0 – 60% F
<1.0 – 50% F
So if a student mastered the level 3 content and got a minimal amount of level 4 content correct, he or she would receive a 3.33. That indicates proficient with a low-partial proficiency at advanced content.
Also, the top tier from 3 to 4 is not split into even sections. We decided to make a 3.33 a 92% B instead of a 93% A. It didn't make sense to have three opportunities for an A and only one for a B.
No comments:
Post a Comment